Did Investments in LGBTQ Diversity Help Improve Relative Corporate Performance During the COVID-19 Crisis?

Authors

  • Benjamin P. Foster Professor of Accountancy, University of Louisville, College of Business, United States
  • Xudong Fu Associate Professor of Finance, University of Louisville, College of Business, United States
  • E. Shaunn Mattingly Associate Professor of Management, Boise State University, College of Business, United States
  • Andrew S. Manikas Professor of Operations, University of Louisville, College of Business, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2025.v26n1p94

Keywords:

COVID-19, corporate value, LGBTQ, Corporate Equality Index, Tobin’s Q

Abstract

The impact of companies’ environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies and practices, particularly sociopolitical activity, on corporate performance is a hotly debated issue. Proponents of corporate ESG efforts and sociopolitical activism believe these actions build corporate social capital that will protect overall corporate value during challenging times and after negative corporate publicity. Corporate LGBTQ inclusiveness is a social dimension of ESG that some stakeholders may consider sociopolitical activism that requires extra effort and cost. We address the impact of corporate LGBTQ inclusiveness policies during challenging economic conditions, using the COVID pandemic as a natural experiment. We examine the association between ratings of organizations based on their policies and activities in support of LGBTQ employees and the LGBTQ community, the Corporate Equality Index (CEI), and corporate performance during challenging economic conditions. We show that CEI rankings before the pandemic are positively and significantly related to Tobin’s Q in 2020 and the change in Tobin’s Q from 2019 to 2020. Also, panel data analysis shows that the positive impact of CEI on Tobin’s Q is more salient in 2020. This study provides evidence that ESG investments in diversity helped improve corporate performance, especially during the COVID crisis.

References

1. Ademi, B., and N. J. Klungseth. 2022. Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. Journal of Global Responsibility 13(4): 421-449.

2. Ahrens, T., and L. Ferry. 2021. Accounting and accountability practices in times of crisis: A Foucauldian perspective on the UK government's response to COVID-19 for England. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6): 1332-1344.

3. Albuquerque, R., Y. Koskinen, , S. Yang, , and C. Zhang, C. 2020. Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9, 593–621. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa011

4. Amiraslani, H., K. V. Lins, H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2023. Trust, social capital, and the bond market benefits of ESG performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(2): 421-462.

5. Bae, K-H, S. El Ghoul, Z. Gong, and O. Guedhami. 2021. Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance 67, 101876.

6. Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility as a conflict between shareholders: Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1): 71-86.

7. Berg, F., J. F Koelbel, and R. Rigobon. 2020. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings (Working Paper), MIT Sloan School.

8. Berg, F., K. Fabisik, and Z. Sautner. 2021. Rewriting history II: The (un)predictable past of ESG ratings (Working Paper): MIT Sloan School.

9. Berk, C. C. 2023. Boycotts hit stocks hard. Here’s what might be next for Bud, Target and others caught in the anti-Pride backlash. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/03/anti-pride-backlash-what-target-anheuser-busch-and-others-should-expect-next-.html

10. Brower, J., and V. Mahajan. 2013. Driven to be good: A Stakeholder Theory perspective on the drivers of Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2): 313-331.

11. Cook, A., and C. Glass. 2016. Do women advance equity? The effect of gender leadership composition on LGBT-friendly policies in American firms. Human Relations, 69(7): 1431-1456.

12. Darbyshire, M. 2020. SG funds continue to outperform wider market. Financial Times, (April 3) https://www.ft.com/content/46bb05a9-23b2-4958-888a-c3e614d75199

13. Demers, E., J. Hendrikse, P. Joos, and B. Lev. 2021. ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 48(3-4): 433-462.

14. Ding, W., R. Levine, C. Lin, and W. Xie. 2021. Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics. 141(2): 802-830.

15. Egan, M., and B. de Lima Voss, 2023. LGBTIQ+ staff and shifting client power within professional services firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 37(6):1537-1557.

16. Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman. 1993, A Stakeholder Theory of the modern corporation: Kantian Capitalism, pp. 75–84.. In Ethical Theory and Business, edited by T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

17. Felix, R., M. Pevzner, and M. Zhao. 2021. Cultural diversity of audit committees and firms' financial reporting quality. Accounting Horizons, 35(3): 143-159.

18. Fisch, J. E., and J. Schwartz. 2024. How Did Corporations Get Stuck in Politics and Can They Escape? The University of Chicago Business Law Review, 3(2), Article 4.

19. Filbeck, G., E. Robbins, and X. Zhao. 2022. Social capital during the coronavirus pandemic: The value of corporate benevolence. Applied Economics, 54(13): 1460-1472.

20. Foster, B. P., A. S. Manikas, and D. Preece. 2020. LGBTQ workplace inclusion before and after Obergefell v. Hodges: Impact on Tobin’s Q and ROA. Journal of Accounting Ethics and Public Policy, 21(3): 481-514. http://ssrn.com/abstract=3735095

21. Foster, B. P., A.S. Manikas, D. Preece, and J.R. Kroes. 2021. Noteworthy diversity efforts and financial performance: Evidence from DiversityInc’s Top 50 for diversity. Advances in Accounting, 53(1): 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2021.100528

22. Foster, B. P., A.S. Manikas, and J.R. Kroes. 2022. Which diversity measures best capture public company value? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2351

23. Gregory, R. P. 2021. Why ROE, ROA, and Tobin’s Q in Regressions Aren’t Good Measures of Corporate Financial Performance for ESG Criteria. (March 16, 2021). Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3775789

24. Gunther, M. 2006. Queer Inc.: How corporate America fell in love with gays and lesbians. It's a movement. CNN Money, (Accessed 3/23/2023) https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/12/11/8395465/index.htm

25. Hale, J. 2020. Sustainable funds weather the first quarter better than conventional funds. Morningstar Sustainability Matters. (April 3). https://www.morningstar.com/articles/976361/sustainable-funds-weather-the-first-quarter-better-thanconventional-Funds

26. Hale, J. 2021a. A broken record: Flows for U.S. sustainable funds again reach new heights. Morningstar Sustainability Matters. (January 28) https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1019195/a-broken-record-flows-for-us-sustainable-fundsagain-reach-new-heights

27. Hale, J. 2021b. Sustainable equity funds outperform traditional peers in 2020. Morningstar Sustainability Matters(January 8). https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1017056/sustainable-equity-funds-outperform-traditional-peers-in-2020

28. Hossain, M., M. Atif, A. Ahmed, and L. Mia. 2020. Do LGBT workplace diversity policies create value for firms? Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04158-z

29. Huang, Y. J. 2022. The association between audit office team diversity and audit quality. Accounting Horizons 36(2), 95-121.

30. Human Rights Campaign Foundation. 2020. Corporate Equality Index 2020: Rating Workplaces on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Equality.

31. https://hrc-prod-requests.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/CEI-2020.pdf?mtime=20200806234745&focal=none

32. McCabe, C. 2020. ESG investing shines in market turmoil, with help from big tech. Wall Street Journal (May 12): https://www.wsj.com/articles/esg-investing-shines-in-market-turmoil-with-help-from-big-tech-11589275801

33. Morgan Stanley. 2021. Sustainable Funds Outperform Peers in 2020 during Coronavirus. https://www.morganstanley.com/ideas/esg-funds-outperform-peers-coronavirus

34. Nagy, Z., and G. Giese. 2020. MSCI ESG indexes during the coronavirus crisis. (April 22): https://www.msci.com/www/blog-posts/msci-esg-indexes-during-the/01781235361

35. Nauman, B. 2020. ESG screens provided no protection in virus sell-off, says study. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/330b3b61-ab53-43be-ad71-11afb0e5f45b

36. Rumens, N. 2016. Sexualities and accounting: A queer theory perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.05.003.

37. Palumbo, A. 2023. Bud Light’s market share hit by boycotts. This beer stock is gaining. Barron’s (August 11): https://www.barrons.com/articles/bud-light-boycotts-molson-coors-stock-price-market-share-671e07e7

38. Pereira, D. de J., d’Angelo, M. J., and B.M. Cola. 2024. Queer Performance of Gay and Cis Men Accountants from the Perspective of Tokenism. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 44(2), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2374235

39. Phang, S. Y., C. Adrian, , M., Garg, A. V. Pham, and C. Truong. 2023. COVID-19 pandemic resilience: An analysis of firm valuation and disclosure of sustainability practices of listed firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 38(1): 85-128.

40. Pichler, S., J. L. Blazovich, A. K. Cook, J. M. Huston, and W. R. Strawser. 2018. Do LGBT-supportive corporate policies enhance firm performance? Human Resource Management, 57(1): 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21831

41. Polman, P. 2020. The coronavirus pandemic may be a turning point for responsible business. Fortune (April 14): https://fortune.com/2020/04/14/coronavirus-responsible-business-leadership-COVID-19/

42. Rao, K., and C. Tilt. 2016 Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2): 327 -347.

43. Roberson, Q., E. N. Ruggs, S. Pichler, and O. Holmes IV. 2024. LGBTQ systems: A framework and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 50(3): 1145-1173.

44. Steffen, T. 2021. ESG scores: An outdated concept. Responsible Investor. (February 15): https://www.responsible-investor.com/articles/esg-scores-an-outdated-concept

45. Tampakoudis, I., A. Noulas, N. Kiosses, and G. Drogalas. 2021.The effect of ESG on value creation from mergers and acquisitions: What changed during the COVID-19 pandemic? Corporate Governance, 21(6): 1117-1141.

46. Wang, P., and J. L. Schwarz. 2010. Stock price reactions to GLBT nondiscrimination policies. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 49(2): 195-216.

47. Wang, S. 2023. Top management team functional diversity and management forecast accuracy. Accounting Horizons, 37(3): 243 - 278.

48. Willis, A. 2020. ESG as an equity vaccine. Morningstar Market Insights. (April 24): https://www.morningstar.ca/ca/news/201741/esg-as-an-equity-vaccine.aspx

49. Wiersema, M. F., and K. A. Bantel, 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1): 91‐121.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-23

How to Cite

Foster, B. P., Fu, X., Mattingly, E. S., & Manikas, A. S. (2025). Did Investments in LGBTQ Diversity Help Improve Relative Corporate Performance During the COVID-19 Crisis?. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, JAEPP, 26(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2025.v26n1p94

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.