GASB 67 and GASB 68: A Narrative Literature Review of Pension Liability Measurement and Disclosure

Authors

  • Joyce Njoroge Associate Professors of Accounting, Zimpleman College of Business, Drake University, USA
  • Lori Solsma Associate Professors of Accounting, Zimpleman College of Business, Drake University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2024.v25n2p160

Keywords:

GASB 67, GASB 68, Pension measurement, Pension Liability, Pension Disclosures

Abstract

This article provides a review of GASB 67 and 68 literature, focusing on two areas: pension liability measurement and pension disclosures requirements. The authors searched for research articles on these topics from EBSCO and Google Scholar using the keywords Pension and GASB for the period 2011 to present. The review evaluates the current state of research on GASB pension standards, assessing their impact on enhancing the measurement, disclosures, and resulting accountability and transparency of public pensions. Research indicates support for the use of the blended discount rate to measure pension obligations; however, some studies suggest that the rate is still high, potentially undervaluing pension liabilities. The standards’ disclosure requirements are found to have improved transparency, compelling governments to alter their behavior to mitigate the adverse effects.

References

1. Allen, A., & Petacchi, R. C. (2023). Preparer Opposition and Strategic Implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards: Evidence from Public Pension Accounting Reform. Management Science, 69(7), 4259-4282.

2. Anantharaman, D., & Chuk, E. (2024). The Impact of Governmental Accounting Standards on Public‐Sector Pension Funding. Review of Accounting Studies, 29, 1948-1996.

3. Apostolou, B., Apostolou, N. G., & Brooks, R. C. (2011). Hie GA(A)P in Underfunded State Pension Liabilities. The CPA Journal, 81(5), 17-21.

4. Apostolou, B., Apostolou, N. G., & Dorminey, J. W. (2013, August). Bridging the Government Pension Reporting Gap. The CPA Journal, 28-35.

5. Biggs, A. G. (2011). Proposed GASB Rules Show Why Only Market Valuation Fully Captures Public Pension Liabilities. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(2), 18-22.

6. Biggs, A. G. (2012). Public Sector Pensions: How Well Funded Are They, Really? State Budget Solutions. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2237647.

7. Biggs, A. G., & Smetters, K. A. (2013). Understanding the Argument for Market Valuation of Public Pension Liabilities. American Enterprise Institute. United States of America. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1297323/understanding-the-argument-for-market-valuation-of-public-pension-liabilities/1900586/ on 06 Jun 2024. CID: 20.500.12592/3z77jg.

8. Birrer, G. E. (2014). GASB Statement 68 on Pensions: A Solution to the Public Pension Crisis? Journal of Government Financial Management, 63(3), 34-38.

9. Copley, P., & Roof, B. (2015, January). GASB Pension Changes: Are You Ready? Journal of Accountancy, 48-53.

10. Dambra, M., Even-Tov, O., & Naughton, J. P. (2023). The Economic Consequences of GASB Financial Statement Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 75(2-3), 1-26.

11. Fan, G. (2022). Economic Consequences of Public Pension Accounting Regulation Changes: Evidence from Housing Markets and Local Economies. Singapore Management University School of Accountancy Research Paper Forthcoming.

12. Flesher, D. L., Foltin, C., Previts, G. J., & Stone, M. S. (2019). A Comprehensive Review of the Evolution of Accounting Standards for State and Local Government Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits in The United States. Accounting Historians Journal, 46(1), 57-77.

13. Foltin, C., Flesher, D. L., Previts, G. J., & Stone, M. S. (2017). State and Local Government Pensions at the Crossroads: Updated Accounting Standards Highlight the Challenges. The CPA Journal, 87(4), 42-51.

14. Foltin, L. C., Flesher, D., Previts, G., & Stone, M. (2018). Public Pension Underfunding: Changes to the Accounting Standards Covering Defined Benefit Plans Have Led to Greater Transparency, but Increased Attention is Transforming How These Plans are Viewed and Managed. Strategic Finance, 100(3), 53-59.

15. Giesecke, O., & Rauh, J. (2023). Trends in State and Local Pension Funds. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 15, 221-238.

16. Giesecke, O., & Rauh, J. D. (2024). State and Local Pension Funds 2022. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 4671133. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4258469.

17. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1987). Objectives of Financial Reporting. Concepts Statement No. 1. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

18. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2005). Communication Methods in General Purpose External Financial Reports That Contain Basic Financial Statements. Concepts Statement No. 3. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

19. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2010). GASB Issues Preliminary Views on Potential Improvements to Pension Standards. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

20. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2011a). Proposed Statement of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Financial Reporting for Pension Plans an amendment of GASB Statement No. 25. Exposure Draft, Norwalk, CT: GASB.

21. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2011b). Proposed Statement of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions an Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27. Exposure Draft, Norwalk, CT: GASB.

22. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2012a). Financial Reporting for Pension Plans. Statement No. 67. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

23. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (2012b). Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pension Plans. Statement No. 68. Norwalk, CT: GASB.

24. Hallman, N., & Khurana, I. K. (2015). State Pension Liabilities and Credit Assessments. Accounting Horizons, 29(4), 946-967.

25. Himick, D., Brivot, M., & Henri, J.-F. (2016). An Ethical Perspective on Accounting Standard Setting: Professional and Lay-Experts’ Contribution to GASB’s Pension Project. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 36, 22-38.

26. Kilgour, J. G. (2013). Public Pension Underfunding in California: A Perfect Storm Likely to Sweep the Nation. Compensation & Benefits Review, 44(6), 345-351.

27. Kilgour, J. G. (2021). State and Local Government Pension Funding on the Eve of the COVID-19 Recession. Compensation & Benefits Review, 53(1), 16-23.

28. Kim, Y., Jiang, X., & Lim, J. (2020). GASB Statement No. 68 Implementation Magnifies Attention to Connecticut Pension Crisis. The Journal of Government Financial Management, 68(4), 60-62.

29. Kriz, K. A., & Chen, G. (2017). How Well Does the Risk-Free Rate Predict the Future Rate of Return on Investments? Implications for Public Defined-Benefit Pension Plans. Municipal Finance Journal, 38(1), 57-72.

30. Lasee, M., & Lieberman, M. (2014). Impact of GASB's New Pension Rules on Government Bond Ratings. Pensions & Investments, 42(8), 14.

31. Mortimer, J. W., & Henderson, L. R. (2014). Measuring Pension Liabilities under GASB Statement No. 68. Accounting Horizons, 28(3), 421-454.

32. Munnell, A. H., & Aubry, J. P. (2016). GASB 68: How Will State Unfunded Pension Liabilities Affect Big Cities? State and Local Pension Plans, 47.

33. Munnell, A. H., Aubry, J. P., Hurwitz, J., & Quinby, L. (2012). How Would GASB Proposals Affect State and Local Pension Reporting? Center for Retirement Reseach at Boston College. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316838.

34. Naughton, J., Petacchi, R., & Weber, J. (2015). Public Pension Accounting Rules and Economic Outcomes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 59(2-3), 221-241.

35. Novy-Marx, R. (2013). Logical Implications of the GASB's Methodology for Valuing Pension Liabilities. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 26-32.

36. Novy-Marx, R., & Rauh, J. (2011, August). Public Pension Promises: How Big Are They and What Are They Worth? The Journal of Finance, LXVI(4), 1211-1249.

37. Pew. (2024). The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved June 2024, from Public Sector Retirement Systems: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/public-sector-retirement-systems

38. Public Plans Data. (2022). National Data. Retrieved June 2024, from Public Plans Data: https://publicplansdata.org/quick-facts/national/

39. Sun, F., & Zhang, Y. H. (2021). GASB 68 and its Impact on the Cost of States' Debt. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 22(3), 325-346.

40. Thornburg, S. W., & Rosacker, K. M. (2018, April). Accounting, Politics, and Public Pensions. The CPA Journal, 28-30.

41. U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023, January). Beyond the Numbers. Retrieved June 2024, from Pay & Benefits: https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-12/how-do-retirement-plans-for-private-industry-and-state-and-local-government-workers-compare.htm#_edn4

42. U. S. Census Bureau. (2022). Retrieved June 2024, from United States Census Bureau: https://www.census.gov/

43. Weinberg, S., & Norcross, E. (2017). GASB 67 and GASB 68: What the New Accounting Standards Mean for Public Pension Reporting. Mercatus on Policy Series. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3245301

Downloads

Published

2024-11-27

How to Cite

Njoroge, J., & Solsma, L. (2024). GASB 67 and GASB 68: A Narrative Literature Review of Pension Liability Measurement and Disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, JAEPP, 25(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2024.v25n2p160

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.