DOES THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT PREVENT THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FROM TREATING ALL “MARRIED” COUPLES EQUALLY?

Authors

  • Joanie Sompayrac The University of Tennessee – Chattanooga
  • Victoria Burge The University of Tennessee – Chattanooga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2013.v14n1p77

Keywords:

Same-sex Marriage, Defense of Marriage Act, Marriage and Taxation, DOMA, Equal Protection

Abstract

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Nevertheless, when Congress enacted the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, it resulted in the Internal Revenue Service treating same-sex married couples differently than heterosexual married couples. The different treatment with a regard to a range of tax issues from filing status to wealth transfers to exclusion from gain on sales of personal residences has raised many Equal Protection challenges. The United States Supreme Court will actually examine the issue in its current session. In the meantime, this article attempts to outline the legal and tax issues that have given rise to these challenges.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

How to Cite

Sompayrac, J., & Burge, V. (2023). DOES THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT PREVENT THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FROM TREATING ALL “MARRIED” COUPLES EQUALLY?. Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, JAEPP, 14(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2013.v14n1p77

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.