Do Variations in Institutional Characteristics Across Countries Affect ESG Reporting Ratings?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60154/jaepp.2025.v26n1p57Keywords:
Self-dealing, ESG reporting, Greenwashing, Responsible InvestingAbstract
We study how the institutional environment of a country affects firms' motivations to engage in ESG reporting. Drawing from the institutional theory (North, 1990), we argue that firms that are incorporated in countries with weaker institutions (defined by transparency, legality, anti-self-dealing enforcement measures) are more likely to report higher ESG scores due to low oversight. We also argue that greenwashing (as opposed to signaling) is an important motivation behind ESG reporting in countries with weaker institutions. We test our hypotheses using data from 2,354 companies across 38 different countries. We employ OLS models for our empirical analyses and find support for some of our hypotheses. Our study advances the literature on responsible investing by demonstrating that institutional differences across nations not only shape the quality of ESG reporting but also influence firms' underlying motivations, revealing the extent to which greenwashing may distort ESG assessments. Our study cautions managers and global investors against taking ESG ratings at face value, as high ESG scores do not necessarily indicate better ESG practices, particularly in low-transparency environments. Just as with financial reporting standards, stronger international reporting standards and oversight are needed to enhance the reliability of reported ESG data.
References
1. Babkin, A., Shkarupeta, E., Tashenova, L., Malevskaia-Malevich, E., & Shchegoleva, T. (2023). Framework for assessing the sustainability of ESG performance in industrial cluster ecosystems in a circular economy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100071
2. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652-1678.
3. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
4. Castillo-Merino, D.; Rodríguez-Pérez, G. (2021). The Effects of Legal Origin and Corporate Governance on Financial Firms’ Sustainability Performance. Sustainability, 13, 8233.
5. Chen G., Firth M., Gao D. N., Rui O. M. (2021). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China, Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (3), 424-448,
6. Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829.
7. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
8. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87.
9. De Bettignies, J. E., & Robinson, D. T. (2015). When is social responsibility socially desirable? (No. w21364). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430-465.
11. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
12. Gelfand, A. (2022) The ESG Generation Gap: Millennials and Boomers Split on Their Investing Goals. Insights by Stanford Business. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/esg-generation-gap-millennials-boomers-split-their-investing-goals
13. Goldman Sachs. (2007). Introducing GS SUSTAIN. New York: Goldman Sachs.
14. Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & Whittaker, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and firm value:
15. Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 633-657.
16. Ipek, I., & Tanyeri, M. (2021). Home country institutional drivers and performance outcomes of export market orientation: the moderating role of firm resources. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(4), 806-836.
17. Isla, Binnie (2023, June 26). BlackRock's Fink says he's stopped using 'weaponised' term ESG. Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/blackrocks-fink-says-hes-stopped-using-weaponised-term-esg-2023-06-26/
18. Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50-58.
19. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 3-27.
20. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 2006. What Works in Securities Laws? The Journal of Finance, 61, 1-32
21. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150.
22. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.
23. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253-261.
24. Lee J., Maxfield, S. (2015). Doing well by reporting good: Reporting corporate responsibility and corporate performance. Business and Society Review, 120(4), 577–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12075
25. Li, R., & Ramanathan, R. (2020). Can environmental investments benefit environmental performance? The moderating roles of institutional environment and foreign direct investment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3385-3398.
26. Liang, H. & Renneboog, L. (2017), On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72: 853-910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12487
27. Lindsay, V., Rod, M. & Ashill, N. (2017), Institutional and resource configurations associated with different SME foreign market entry modes. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 66, pp. 130-144.
28. Luxmore, S. R., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2018). Institutional determinants of environmental corporate social responsibility: Are multinational entities taking advantage of weak environmental enforcement in lower‐income nations? Business and Society Review, 123(1), 151-179.
29. Lydenberg, S. D. (2002). Envisioning socially responsible investing: A model for 2006. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 7, 57–77.
30. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K. & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 61-80.
31. Mion, G., Cristian R., & Adaui L. (2019). Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability, 11, 17: 4612.
32. North D. C. (1981 ) Structure and change in economic history. Norton
33. North D.C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New York
34. Pucker, K. P. & King, A. (2022). ESG investing isn’t designed to save the planet. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/08/esg-investing-isnt-designed-to-save-the-planet?autocomplete=true
35. Rothenberg, S. (2007). Environmental managers as institutional entrepreneurs: The influence of institutional and technical pressures on waste management. Journal of Business Research 60: 749-757.
36. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
37. Shleifer, A., Wolfenzon, D., (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 3–27.
38. Taparia, H. (2022, September 29) One of the Hottest Trends in the World of Investing Is a Sham. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/29/opinion/esg-investing-responsibility.html?smid=url-share
39. Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of global responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
40. Wang, W., Yu, Y., & Li, X. (2022). ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 948674.
41. Witt, M. A., Fainshmidt, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). Our board, our rules: Nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(1), 131-166.
42. Yu, E. P. Y., Van Luu, B., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101192.
43. Yu, E. P. Y., & Luu, B. V. (2021). International variations in ESG disclosure – Do cross-listed companies care more? International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, 101731.
44. Zhang, D. (2022). Are firms motivated to greenwash by financial constraints? Evidence from global firms' data. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33, 459– 479.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ekin Alakent, M. Sinan Goktan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
